Deployment Outcomes
What changes when you close the execution gap
These are real deployments. Real operators. Real supply chains. The company names are confidential. The numbers are not.
Case Study 01
Food Distribution · Multi-Site · Central AsiaOne of the largest food distribution operations in the region. Managing end-to-end supply chain across four countries, three distribution centres, and tens of thousands of active SKUs. Manual governance processes were creating significant fulfillment variance and compliance exposure.
Situation before
Inventory decisions were made through a combination of Excel models and phone calls between site managers. Fulfillment variance was running high enough that major retail customers were starting to flag it in quarterly reviews. Stock was sitting in the wrong locations — neither available where needed nor liquidatable without manual intervention.
What Groflex deployed
Signal detection across all three distribution centres. Inventory rebalancing recommendations routed to VP Supply for approval. Governed handoff to their ops team for approved transfers — fully documented with instructions, approver name, and timestamp. No verbal approvals. No re-entry ambiguity.
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fulfillment Variance | Baseline | — | ↓ 18% |
| Stockout Incidents | Baseline | — | ↓ 31% |
| Inventory Accuracy | 87% | 96% | +9 points |
“The thing that surprised us was the speed. We expected a long implementation. Instead, within two weeks we were seeing recommendations we actually trusted — and by week four we were executing on them directly.”
VP Supply Chain, Food Distribution Operator
Case Study 02
Food Manufacturing · Enterprise Production · EuropeOne of the largest manufacturing operations in its country. Complex multi-line production environment with three distribution centres and strict compliance requirements. Unplanned downtime and inventory accuracy were the primary operational pain points.
Situation before
Production planning and supply chain operated with significant information lag. By the time an inventory gap or throughput issue was visible in reporting, it had already impacted production schedules. Compliance documentation was manual and time-consuming.
What Groflex deployed
Real-time throughput monitoring. Inventory signal detection across all three DCs. Compliance-aware recommendation engine with audit trail generation. Every decision logged for FSMA 204 and EU AI Act readiness.
| Metric | Change |
|---|---|
| Throughput across 3 DCs | ↑ 12% |
| Inventory accuracy | ↑ 9 points |
| Unplanned downtime | ↓ 22% |
“We had tried other platforms. They all gave us better dashboards. Groflex gave us fewer problems.”
Head of Operations, Food Manufacturing
COMPLIANCE READINESS
Built for EU AI Act & FDA FSMA 204
Every detection event, approval, and documented action in these deployments is captured in Groflex's tamper-proof audit trail — designed to meet EU AI Act Article 12 traceability requirements and FDA FSMA 204 Key Data Element capture. Compliance is not a feature added later. It is the foundation.
Learn about our compliance framework →Active in two more sectors
Healthcare Supply Chain · Japan
Top 5 healthcare supply chain operator. Regulated facilities across national coverage. LOI signed. Pilot scoping underway.
Food Brand · National Scale
Top national food brand. Enterprise-wide rollout potential. In negotiation.